This is a real Parseo analysis — a public municipal RFP, processed by the exact pipeline your document goes through.

Try it free on your document →
State RFP46 pages·Analyzed in 323.3s

Request for Proposals - Audit Consulting Services for the Internal Audit Division For The City Manager's Office

City of Pasadena, California (City Manager's Office)

Solicitation: 2026-RFP-0321

Submission deadline

Tuesday, July 7, 2026, 2:00pm

Requirements

83

70 mandatory

Eval criteria

7

Best Value / competitive

Key dates

12

deadlines & milestones

Highlights

20

3 critical

Financial terms

20

Not specified - propos…

3 considerations to review

Mandatory professional certification requirement. Proposer must possess CIA, CPA, CGAP, CFE, or CGFM certification to be eligible. Firms without any of these credentials are disqualified from bidding.

p.5 · Verify that at least one proposed team member (or the firm) holds one of the listed certifications and include a copy of the certificate in the submittal package as required in Section 13(k).

Form AA-1 (Equal Employment Opportunity) is a mandatory submittal; failure to submit results in automatic disqualification with no exceptions. This is a hard pass/fail gate independent of proposal quality.

p.12 · Complete and submit Form AA-1 with the proposal, or confirm that an approved form is currently on file with the City of Pasadena before the submission deadline.

Unlimited liability required. The City requires proposers to provide services 'without monetary limitations on liability.' Any exception must be expressly stated and may render the proposal non-responsive. This is legally unusual and commercially risky for a professional services (audit) firm.

p.16 · Consult legal/risk management. Consider whether to accept unlimited liability or to expressly state a limitation as a separate line item, accepting the risk of a non-responsiveness finding. Coordinate with E&O insurer on coverage adequacy.

Document overview

This is a City of Pasadena (California) municipal RFP organized into 13 numbered sections following a standard state/local government procurement format: introduction and timeline, general instructions, general requirements, city-specific requirements (including EEO, living wage, accessibility/ADA, and DHS disclosure), insurance, scope of work (performance audit consulting services), sample contract terms, price proposal template, review/award process, public contract claims procedure (PCC §9204), weighted evaluation criteria (100 points total plus 10 preference points), submittal instructions via OpenGov eProcurement portal, and a detailed submittals checklist. The scope centers on GAGAS/IIA-compliant performance audits with a one-year base term plus two one-year options, and required certifications include CIA, CPA, CGAP, CFE, or CGFM. Attachments A–I (Master Services Contract, AA forms, Non-Collusion, Disqualification, Conflict of Interest, TPA, Designated Representatives, Relevant Experience) are referenced on page 2 but not included as full text in the body.

Financials

Total contract value

$75

Not specified - proposer must provide lump-sum/unit pricing based on ~450 annual

payment schedule

Availability of Funds Clause

City of Pasadena · p.17

Contract payment subject to fund availability; City may amend/terminate

penalty

Limitations on Liability

Consultant · p.16

No monetary limitations on liability (exceptions may cause non-responsiveness)

penalty

Interest on Late Payments (PCC 9204)

City of Pasadena · p.27

7% per annum

fee structure

Estimated Annual Level of Effort

Consultant · p.25

450 hours annually

reimbursement

Lump-sum pricing requirement (all-inclusive)

Consultant · p.6

All costs inclusive - travel, lodging, incidentals not separately reimbursed

fee structure

Annual Price Adjustment Cap (CPI)

Consultant · p.9

Capped at CPI - Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, all urban consumers, not seasonally adjusted

other

Living Wage Ordinance Threshold

Consultant · p.15

$25,000

other

Non-Collusion Declaration Threshold

Consultant · p.13

$75,000

insurance bonding

Insurance Requirement

Consultant · p.16

Professional Services insurance per City requirements - required prior to award

insurance bonding

Bid Bond (if required)

Consultant · p.39

5% of total bid price via Surety2000 electronic bond

other

Levine Act Political Contribution Threshold

Consultant · p.10

$500 in preceding 12 months

fee structure

Pasadena Business License Fee (limited entries)

Consultant · p.13

33% of annual tax if entering City ≤10 times; full annual fee if >10 times

other

TPA 10% equity/interest threshold

Consultant · p.10

10% equity, participation, or revenue interest triggers TPA disclosure

fee structure

Cost Proposal Scoring - Ratio Method

p.34

15 points; lowest price receives max points; others scored proportionally

fee structure

Taxes Included in Price

Consultant · p.15

All federal, state, local and other taxes included in bid price

other

Change Order Requirement

Consultant · p.9

All out-of-scope work requires written City approval before commencement

fee structure

Pricing Basis - Hourly rates for key personnel

Consultant · p.42

Level of effort and hourly rate for key personnel; detailed sub-consultant fee breakdown

Observations

The RFP structures a task-order-based professional services contract with an initial 1-year term plus two optional 1-year extensions, estimated at approximately 450 hours annually. Pricing must be fully loaded (lump-sum inclusive of travel, lodging, taxes, and all overhead) with no separate reimbursements, and annual escalations are capped at the Los Angeles-area CPI. Notable onerous provisions include a requirement of unlimited liability (exceptions risk non-responsiveness), mandatory Living Wage compliance (>$25K), Taxpayer Protection Act disclosures, and boilerplate bid bond/public-works-claim language (5% bid bond, 7% interest) that appears carried over from construction templates and may not truly apply to this audit engagement.

Timeline

notice

RFP Release Date

Monday, June 8, 2026

qa

Deadline to submit questions related to the solicitation

Tuesday, June 23, 2026, prior to 2:00 pm

14:00

submission

Proposal Submission Deadline

July 7, 2026, 2:00pm

14:00

submission

Electronic proposal submission deadline via eProcurement Portal

2:00 pm on Tuesday, July 7, 2026

14:00

submission

Withdrawal of proposal deadline

2:00 pm on Tuesday, July 7, 2026

14:00

Events without specific dates

other

Firm availability of service must be maintained for at least four months after proposal opening

four months after date for opening proposals

other

Proposed key personnel must be available for 90 days from proposal due date

ninety (90) days from the proposal due date

other

Selected vendor must provide required documents within 10 calendar days of notification

within 10 calendar days of being notified

kickoff

Audit plan due within 1 month of project kickoff (per engagement)

within 1 month of project kickoff

other

Draft report due within a maximum of 6 months of completing fieldwork

within a maximum of 6 months of completing fieldwork

other

Final report due within 30 business days of receiving City comments

within 30 business days of receiving City comments

other

Initial contract term of one year from contract execution, with two optional one-year extensions

one years from the date the City executes the contract

Requirements (83)

70 mandatory7 desirable6 informational
mandatory

Proposer must possess and provide one of the specified certifications: CIA, CPA, CGAP, CFE, or CGFM to be deemed qualified.

Qualifications·§2.2 Eligibility Requirement·p.5
mandatory

Proposals must be submitted electronically through the City of Pasadena's eProcurement Portal no later than 2:00 pm on Tuesday, July 7, 2026.

Submission·§2.3 Electronic Submission·p.5
mandatory

The entire proposal must be formatted on standard-size 8½”x11” pages in 12 point font only.

Format·§2.3·p.5
mandatory

The 'Technical Proposal,' 'Additional Data,' and 'Statement of Qualifications' can be no more than 50 grand total pages combined.

Format·§2.3·p.5
mandatory

Proposal must be prepared in two separate parts: a Technical Proposal and a Price Proposal, each complete in itself so evaluations can be conducted separately.

Submission·§2.4·p.6
mandatory

No pricing shall be included in the Technical Proposal.

Submission·§2.4·p.6
mandatory

Price Proposal must include all costs associated with the Technical Proposal, including lump-sum price covering all designs, equipment, materials, labor, insurance, overhead, profit, taxes, and other costs.

Financial·§2.5·p.6
mandatory

Vendor's RFP response must be inclusive of all costs and expenses associated with travel, lodging, and any other incidental costs; the City will not separately reimburse costs not included in the proposal.

Financial·§2.5·p.6
mandatory

Any additional fees outside the scope of the agreement must be approved in writing before commencing services for said fees.

Financial·§2.5·p.6
mandatory

Proposer must maintain availability of service as set forth in its proposal for at least four months after date for opening proposals.

Commercial·§3.2·p.8
mandatory

Proposer must provide experience with governmental agencies for three projects/contracts of similar scope, size, complexity and subject matter within the past five (5) years and submit the Relevant Experience Form.

Past Performance·§3.3·p.8
mandatory

Each Proposer shall include in the price bid any patent fees, royalties and charges on any patented article or process to be furnished or used in the Work.

Legal·§3.6·p.8
mandatory

Price increases at contract year renewals shall not exceed the CPI 'All items in Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA, all urban consumers, not seasonally adjusted' for the preceding 12-month period.

Financial·§3.9·p.9
mandatory

Any additional work outside the original Scope of Services must be recorded as a Change Order and approved by the City Project Manager in writing before work is started.

Management·§3.10·p.9
mandatory

Contractor must comply with Pasadena Taxpayer Protection Act (TPA), complete TPA forms, and submit a copy of the completed TPA form to the City Clerk's Office if the contract is to be awarded by the City Council.

Legal·§3.11·p.10
mandatory

Proposer shall disclose any financial, business or other relationship with the City of Pasadena that may impact the outcome of the contract, and complete/submit the Conflict of Interest Statement form.

Legal·§3.12·p.10
mandatory

Proposers must comply with the Levine Act (Government Code Section 84308) regarding political contributions exceeding $500 from officers of a local government agency.

Legal·§3.13·p.10
mandatory

Prime Contractor shall be solely responsible for timely and full payment of all subcontractors, suppliers, laborers, in accordance with California Public Contract Code §§ 10262 and 10262.5 and Labor Code § 218.7.

Legal·§3.14·p.11
mandatory

Prime Contractor shall include in all subcontracts a provision requiring subcontractors to pay their lower-tier subcontractors and suppliers in a timely manner.

Legal·§3.14·p.11
mandatory

Contractor expressly agrees to comply with the City's Equal Employment Opportunity ordinances and regulations (Chapter 4.08 of the Pasadena Municipal Code).

Legal·§4.2·p.12
mandatory

Each bidder or proposer must submit a completed Form AA-1. Failure to submit this form will result in automatic disqualification unless proposer has an approved Form on file with the City.

Forms·§4.2·p.12
mandatory

Each bidder or proposer must execute and submit the Declaration of Non-Collusion with the Proposal (applies to formal solicitations $75,000 or more).

Forms·§4.3·p.13
mandatory

Contractor agrees to recruit Pasadena residents initially and to give them preference, if all other factors are equal, for any new positions resulting from performance of this contract.

Local Preferences·§4.6·p.13
mandatory

Awarded bidder or proposer may be required to obtain and pay for any required Pasadena business license under Title 5 of the Pasadena Municipal Code.

Legal·§4.7·p.13
mandatory

Contract totaling $25,000 or more for services is subject to the Pasadena Living Wage Ordinance (PMC Chapter 4.11); selected contractor must submit payroll records evidencing compliance.

Legal·§4.11·p.15
mandatory

Vendor providing labor must comply with the City of Pasadena Minimum Wage as set forth in Chapter 5.02 of the Pasadena Municipal Code.

Legal·§4.12·p.15
mandatory

Price bid or Price Proposals shall include all federal, state, local and other taxes.

Financial·§4.15·p.15
mandatory

Proof of insurance will be required prior to the City's award of the contract per Insurance Requirements section.

Insurance·§4.16·p.16
mandatory

Winning proposal may be required to submit a completed and signed IRS Form W-9; failure to submit may result in non-responsive determination.

Forms·§4.17·p.16
mandatory

Bidders shall provide goods/services without monetary limitations on liability; any exceptions must be expressly stated in detail as a separate line item and not part of form documents.

Legal·§4.18·p.16
mandatory

Contractor must ensure all services, programs, activities, and facilities comply with ADA Title II, Section 504 of Rehabilitation Act, CBC, CCR Title 24, and other applicable accessibility laws.

Accessibility·§4.22.1·p.17
mandatory

All digital deliverables shall conform to Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1, Level AA, and Section 508 where applicable; testing and VPAT/ACR documentation required.

Accessibility·§4.22.3·p.18
mandatory

Contractor shall correct any noncompliant work or deliverables identified by the City or any enforcement agency at no additional cost.

Accessibility·§4.22.5·p.18
mandatory

Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless the City from claims, damages, or liabilities arising from noncompliance with applicable accessibility laws.

Legal·§4.22.5·p.18
mandatory

By submitting a proposal, Contractor certifies compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local accessibility laws including ADA, CBC, Title 24, and PROWAG, and will ensure all subcontractors do the same.

Accessibility·§4.22.6·p.19
desirable

Respondents are invited (encouraged) to disclose any current contracts, subcontracts, or agreements with U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), including data-sharing arrangements.

Disclosures·§4.23·p.19
mandatory

Consultant shall conduct performance audits in accordance with GAGAS (Yellow Book) or IIA (Red Book) standards.

Technical·§6.1.1·p.21
mandatory

All audit plans must be reviewed and approved by the City's Internal Audit Manager prior to fieldwork.

Technical·§6.1.1.1·p.21
mandatory

Consultant shall maintain complete and organized audit workpapers that support all findings and conclusions.

Technical·§6.1.1.2·p.21
mandatory

Consultant shall provide bi-weekly status updates to Internal Audit, either verbally or through reporting.

Management·§6.1.1.2·p.21
mandatory

Consultant must be able to travel for an in-person meeting to present results to Finance/Audit Committee or City Council if requested by Internal Audit.

Management·§6.1.1.3·p.22
mandatory

All reports must meet GAGAS or IIA reporting standards.

Technical·§6.1.1.3·p.22
mandatory

Consultant must demonstrate experience conducting GAGAS or IIA-compliant performance audits for public agencies.

Qualifications·§6.1.2·p.22
mandatory

Consultant must demonstrate knowledge of municipal operations, budgeting, procurement, and internal controls.

Qualifications·§6.1.2·p.22
desirable

Professional certifications such as CIA, CPA, CGAP, CFE, or CGFM are preferred.

Qualifications·§6.1.2·p.22
mandatory

Audit plan shall be delivered within 1 month of project kickoff.

Deliverables·§6.1.3·p.23
mandatory

Draft report shall be delivered within a maximum of 6 months of completing fieldwork.

Deliverables·§6.1.3·p.23
mandatory

Final report shall be delivered within 30 business days of receiving City comments.

Deliverables·§6.1.3·p.23
mandatory

Consultant must maintain strict confidentiality of all City information and comply with all applicable data-security requirements, including secure storage and transmission.

Security·§6.1.5·p.23
mandatory

Consultant shall comply with GAGAS/IIA standards, City policies, applicable federal/state/local laws, and conflict-of-interest and ethics requirements.

Compliance·§6.1.6·p.23
informational

Initial contract term is one year with two optional one-year extension periods subject to City Manager approval.

Contract·§7.1·p.24
mandatory

Price Proposal shall specify at a minimum the level of effort and hourly rate for Proposer's key personnel/project position with detailed breakdown of fees for each sub-consultant.

Financial·§13.2.e·p.42
mandatory

Price Proposal shall include a line item for Annual Hours quantity 450 hours.

Financial·§8·p.25
mandatory

Proposals may be submitted questions via the City's eProcurement Portal Q&A function; deadline for questions is Tuesday, June 23, 2026 prior to 2:00 pm.

Submission·§1.3·p.3
mandatory

Proposers must not contact any City employee or official regarding this solicitation.

Submission·§1.3·p.4
mandatory

Vendor's failure to address the requirements of any and all addenda may result in the response not being considered.

Submission·§4.21·p.17
mandatory

Proposal must include a Cover Letter (maximum one page) with name/address of organization, entity type, and contact person information.

Submission·§13.2.c·p.41
mandatory

Technical Proposal must include Key Personnel section describing project team, roles/responsibilities, resumes, qualifications, licenses, and certifications.

Staffing·§13.2.d·p.41
mandatory

Technical Proposal must include Qualifications section with firm history, core practice areas, and summary of relevant experience within the past five (5) years.

Past Performance·§13.2.d·p.41
mandatory

Technical Proposal must provide a minimum of three (3) references for clients with comparable services within the past five (5) years.

Past Performance·§13.2.d·p.41
mandatory

Technical Proposal must include a Project Work Plan describing understanding of required services, proposed approach, methodology, and project management plan.

Technical·§13.2.d·p.41
mandatory

Proposed team members should be available for ninety (90) days from the proposal due date; the City must be promptly notified of any changes in key personnel prior to award.

Staffing·§13.2.d·p.42
mandatory

Technical Proposal must include a proposed work schedule indicating duration, completion dates, deliverables/milestones, and time estimates for City Staff engagement.

Technical·§13.2.d·p.42
mandatory

Proposer must upload a copy of the CIA, CPA, CGAP, CFE, or CGFM certification/license.

Forms·§13.4.k·p.43
mandatory

Proposer must submit the Disclosure of Contracts with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) form.

Forms·§13.5.m·p.44
mandatory

Proposer must submit Forms AA-1, AA-2 (if labor/services exceed $25,000), Signature & Legal Status, and Declaration of Non-Collusion.

Forms·§13.5.n·p.44
desirable

Form AA-3 is optional.

Forms·§13.5.n·p.44
mandatory

Proposer must complete and submit the Taxpayer Protection Amendment Disclosure form.

Forms·§13.5.o·p.45
mandatory

Proposer must complete and submit the Conflict of Interest form.

Forms·§13.5.p·p.45
mandatory

Proposer must complete and submit the Relevant Experience Form with bid.

Forms·§13.5.q·p.45
mandatory

Proposer must complete and submit the Designated Representative form.

Forms·§13.5.r·p.45
mandatory

Proposer must complete and submit the Disqualification Disclosure form.

Forms·§13.5.s·p.45
mandatory

Proposer must confirm Proposer Certification acknowledging review of solicitation documents under penalty of perjury.

Forms·§13.1.a·p.40
mandatory

Mandatory Content of proposal includes Cover Letter, Table of Contents, Required Certifications and Forms, Technical Proposal, Price Proposal, Statement of Qualifications/Experience, and Additional Data (if required).

Submission·§13.2.b·p.40
mandatory

Selected vendor must provide W-9, Pasadena Business License (if required), any Required Licenses/Certifications, and Insurance within 10 calendar days of notification.

Submission·§13.2.b·p.41
desirable

To be awarded a 5-point Local Pasadena Business preference, the proposer must have an official business address within the City of Pasadena at the time the RFP is posted.

Preferences·§11 Criteria 6·p.34
desirable

To be awarded a 5-point Small/Micro-Business preference, the proposer must be certified by the State of California as a small or micro-business.

Preferences·§11 Criteria 7·p.34
informational

Evaluation will be based on weighted criteria: Qualifications and Experience (30), Proposed Approach and Methodology (25), Key Personnel (10), Past Performance & References (10), Cost Proposal (15), Local Pasadena Business (5), Small/Micro-Business (5).

Evaluation·§11·p.33
informational

City of Pasadena background: approximately 142,017 people; ninth-largest city in Los Angeles County; covers approximately 22.5 square miles.

Background·§1.2·p.3
mandatory

Proposals received after the Proposal Deadline may not be accepted by the City.

Submission·§2.3·p.5
mandatory

Proposers must acknowledge each addenda released via the City's eProcurement Portal in the Addenda Confirmation section.

Submission·§12.7·p.37
mandatory

If addenda is issued after response submission, Proposer must acknowledge the new addenda AND resubmit the bid; failure to do both will invalidate the offer.

Submission·§12.9·p.38
mandatory

All vendors providing paper products shall provide products containing no less than 30% minimum recycled content and recyclability (applies only when buying paper products under SB 1383).

Compliance·§4.19·p.16

Extracted from City of Pasadena RFP for Audit Consulting Services for the Internal Audit Division (Project ID 2026-RFP-0321). Requirements span eligibility, submission, contract, insurance, scope of work, evaluation, and mandatory forms. Contract type appears to be a multi-year professional services contract with as-needed task orders; pricing structure requires lump-sum with hourly detail (450 annual hours line item).

Evaluation criteria

Best Value / competitive selection process based on weighted point scoring across seven factors totaling 100 base points (with 10 possible preference points via Local Pasadena Business and Small/Micro-Business Pass/Fail bonuses). Technical Proposal and Price Proposal are evaluated separately, potentially by different committees. A screening committee first determines responsiveness; a selection panel then evaluates responsive proposals. The winner is chosen based on the Total Average points of all evaluators across all scoring factors. Cost is scored using a Ratio Method (Lowest Price / Evaluated Price × max points). The City reserves the right to invite all proposers—or only the top three ranked firms—for oral clarification meetings before final scoring. Contract awards over $75,000 require City Manager approval; over $250,000 require City Council approval. This is a professional services (audit consulting) RFP, not a federal FAR-governed procurement; no FAR/DFARS clauses, security clearances, or federal small business set-asides apply. Contract type is a multi-year task-order/as-needed services contract (1-year initial term with two optional 1-year extensions), with pricing structured on an annual hours basis (450 hours sample line item) plus lump-sum components.

Qualifications and Experience

30 points (30% of Total)

Points awarded based on demonstrated experience conducting IIA or GAGAS-compliant performance audits for public agencies; relevant certifications (CPA, CIA, CGAP, CFE, CGFM); and experience with municipal operations.

IIA or GAGAS-compliant performance audit experience for public agenciesRelevant certifications (CPA, CIA, CGAP, CFE, CGFM)Experience with municipal operations

p.33

Proposed Approach and Methodology

25 points (25% of Total)

Quality and clarity of proposed audit methodology, work plan, risk assessment approach, data analytics experience and software used, sampling techniques, workpaper structures, and reporting structure.

Audit methodologyWork planRisk assessment approachData analytics experience and software usedSampling techniquesWorkpaper structuresReporting structure

p.33

Key Personnel

10 points (10% of Total)

Points awarded based on experience, credentials, and availability of proposed project team; strength of resumes; and relevance of past work.

Experience of proposed teamCredentialsAvailabilityStrength of resumesRelevance of past work

p.33

Past Performance & References

10 points (10% of Total)

Points awarded based on quality of prior work for government clients; reference feedback; and history of delivering projects on time and within budget.

Quality of prior work for government clientsReference feedbackOn-time/on-budget delivery history

p.33

Cost Proposal

15 points (15% of Total)

Points assigned based on a 'Ratio Method'—lowest price receives maximum points; all others receive (Lowest Price / Evaluated Price) x maximum points. Factors considered include competitiveness, clarity, and completeness of pricing; and alignment with proposed staffing and methodology.

Competitiveness of pricingClarity of pricingCompleteness of pricingAlignment with proposed staffing and methodology

p.34

Local Pasadena Business

5 points (5% of Total) — Pass/Fail

Pass/Fail preference awarded if proposer has an official business address within the City of Pasadena at the time this RFP is posted on the City's website.

p.34

Small or Micro-Business

5 points (5% of Total) — Pass/Fail

Pass/Fail preference awarded if the proposer is certified by the State of California Department of General Services as a small or micro-business.

p.34

Strategic observations

The scoring structure signals that Pasadena prioritizes technical merit heavily (Qualifications 30% + Approach 25% + Key Personnel 10% + Past Performance 10% = 75% non-price) over price (15%), which is typical of professional audit engagements where competence, GAGAS/IIA compliance, and municipal audit experience are paramount. The heavy weighting on Qualifications & Experience (30%) combined with mandatory certification eligibility (CIA, CPA, CGAP, CFE, or CGFM) indicates the City will screen out firms lacking government audit credentials before scoring even begins. The dual 5-point preferences for Local Pasadena and California Small/Micro-Business (10 potential bonus points—two-thirds the weight of the entire cost proposal) create a meaningful competitive edge for small local firms and could be decisive in a close competition. The Ratio Method for cost scoring rewards aggressive pricing but the modest 15% weight limits how much a low bid can compensate for weak technical qualifications, so proposers should emphasize demonstrated GAGAS/IIA public-sector audit portfolios and named certified personnel rather than competing primarily on price.

Highlights (20)

criticaleligibility

Mandatory professional certification requirement. Proposer must possess CIA, CPA, CGAP, CFE, or CGFM certification to be eligible. Firms without any of these credentials are disqualified from bidding.

Verify that at least one proposed team member (or the firm) holds one of the listed certifications and include a copy of the certificate in the submittal package as required in Section 13(k).

p.5

criticaldisqualifier

Form AA-1 (Equal Employment Opportunity) is a mandatory submittal; failure to submit results in automatic disqualification with no exceptions. This is a hard pass/fail gate independent of proposal quality.

Complete and submit Form AA-1 with the proposal, or confirm that an approved form is currently on file with the City of Pasadena before the submission deadline.

p.12

criticallegal risk

Unlimited liability required. The City requires proposers to provide services 'without monetary limitations on liability.' Any exception must be expressly stated and may render the proposal non-responsive. This is legally unusual and commercially risky for a professional services (audit) firm.

Consult legal/risk management. Consider whether to accept unlimited liability or to expressly state a limitation as a separate line item, accepting the risk of a non-responsiveness finding. Coordinate with E&O insurer on coverage adequacy.

p.16

highambiguity

Lump-sum pricing requirement is inconsistent with the as-needed/task-order nature of the work. The RFP simultaneously requires 'lump-sum price for performing all services and work called for in the SCOPE OF WORK' while stating services are on an as-needed basis via task orders with an annual line item of 450 hours. This creates significant pricing ambiguity.

Submit a question through the eProcurement Q&A before June 23, 2026 seeking clarification on whether pricing should be lump-sum, hourly (unit price for 450 hours), or blended. Document assumptions in the price proposal.

p.25

highlegal risk

Availability of Funds clause allows the City to unilaterally amend, suspend, decrease, or terminate its payment obligations with the City as 'sole judge' of funding availability. Consultant is only compensated for work performed prior to termination.

Recognize this termination-for-convenience/funding risk in pricing and cash flow planning. Include a demobilization/wind-down clause in negotiated task orders if possible.

p.17

mediumunusual provision

Price adjustment capped at Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim CPI. Given the multi-year term (up to 3 years including options), inflation in professional labor rates may outpace CPI, eroding margins over the contract life.

Price first-year rates with adequate cushion to absorb the possibility that labor costs (particularly for certified auditors) rise faster than regional CPI in years 2 and 3.

p.9

mediumambiguity

Firm commitment of availability required for at least four months after proposal opening, but Section 13(d) proposal instructions state proposed personnel should be available for only 90 days. Conflicting commitment periods create ambiguity.

Assume the longer 4-month commitment governs offer validity while the 90-day personnel availability applies to proposed key staff. Submit a Q&A question for clarification.

p.8

mediumlegal risk

Taxpayer Protection Act imposes gift/campaign contribution restrictions on the firm, its trustees, directors, partners, corporate officers, and anyone with more than 10% equity/participation/revenue interest. Non-compliance risks are significant and extend beyond the immediate proposal team.

Circulate the TPA restrictions to all officers, directors, and >10% equity holders. Complete the TPA disclosure form and submit both to City Clerk and with the proposal package.

p.10

mediumambiguity

Public Contract Code Section 9204 claims procedure references 'public works project' repeatedly, but this RFP is for professional audit consulting services—not construction. The heavy inclusion of construction-oriented terms (bid bonds, Surety2000, Construction & Demolition Waste Management Plan, PROWAG, patent/royalty clauses) suggests the RFP uses a boilerplate template that may create ambiguity about which clauses actually apply.

Submit Q&A to confirm which construction-oriented provisions (bid bond, PCC 9204 claims procedure, PROWAG, C&D Waste Plan) do not apply to this audit services engagement, and confirm applicability of the Section 9204 claims process to a non-public-works contract.

p.27

mediumlegal risk

Broad indemnification for accessibility (ADA/Title 24/PROWAG) noncompliance. Contractor indemnifies City for accessibility-related claims even though most audit consulting deliverables are documents/reports where accessibility applies only to digital content.

Ensure all deliverables (reports, presentations, digital documents) meet WCAG 2.1 AA. Include accessibility remediation effort in the price proposal or negotiate scope limitation.

p.18

mediumunusual provision

City's sole and absolute discretion to determine qualification and to extend contract. Option year extensions are 'in his sole and absolute discretion' of City Manager, and the City's judgment on proposer qualification is 'final, binding and conclusive.' Limits proposer's recourse.

Plan business case on the initial 1-year term only; treat option years as upside. Do not amortize startup investments across the maximum 3-year potential term.

p.24

mediumscope creep

Very short initial contract term (1 year) with two 1-year options. Given the 6+ month audit lifecycle described in the Scope of Work (audit plan within 1 month; draft report within 6 months of completing fieldwork; final report within 30 business days of comments), only 1-2 full audits can realistically be delivered in the base year.

Confirm expected audit volume in the 450 annual hours line item. Clarify whether 450 hours represents the total ceiling or a target quantity for as-needed task orders.

p.24

mediumunusual provision

DHS disclosure requirement. While explicitly stated as not affecting evaluation, disclosure of any DHS contracts/data-sharing arrangements is required. Vendors with DHS relationships should carefully consider political/reputational implications given the City's stated intent to review contracting and data-sharing practices.

Complete the DHS disclosure form truthfully. If the firm has DHS relationships, prepare a clear description of services and confirm whether third-party data-sharing is involved.

p.19

mediumlegal risk

Levine Act compliance requires proposer to ensure employees, agents, and consultants avoid making political contributions >$500 to any City official for 12 months preceding through 12 months after contract award. Broad scope requires proactive compliance monitoring.

Screen political contribution activity of the firm, its principals, agents, and lobbyists prior to proposal submission and for 12 months after award to avoid inadvertent violations.

p.10

mediumunusual provision

Local Pasadena Business preference (5 pts) and Small/Micro Business preference (5 pts) provide a combined 10-point advantage (10% of 100) to qualifying firms. Non-local, non-small businesses start at a scoring disadvantage.

If eligible, obtain State of California DGS Small/Micro Business certification before submission. Non-local firms should sharpen technical differentiation to overcome up to 10 points of preference disadvantage.

p.34

mediumambiguity

Boilerplate references to bid bond via Surety2000 and Construction & Demolition Waste Management Plan appear in the submittal instructions, though a professional services audit RFP normally does not require these. Creates uncertainty about whether a 5% bid bond is actually required.

Submit a Q&A question confirming no bid bond, performance bond, or C&D Waste Management Plan is required for this audit consulting engagement.

p.39

lowlegal risk

Living Wage Ordinance and City-wide Minimum Wage compliance apply to contracts >$25,000, requiring payroll record submission. May affect subcontractor and staff cost structure.

Verify all staff performing work under the contract are paid at or above Pasadena Living Wage. Build compliance/reporting overhead into the price proposal.

p.15

lowlegal risk

Trade secret / confidentiality protections require specific marking of each element; blanket confidentiality statements are 'not sufficient and shall not bind the City.' City assumes no liability for disclosure of unmarked materials under the California Public Records Act.

Individually mark each confidential/trade-secret element of the proposal; do not rely on cover-page or section-level markings. Legal review recommended before submission.

p.5

lowother

50-page total limit for Technical Proposal, Additional Data, and Statement of Qualifications combined. With multiple required content sections (personnel, qualifications, references, work plan, resumes for all key personnel), page discipline is essential.

Plan proposal layout carefully to fit within 50 pages using 12-point font on 8.5x11 pages. Consider placing resumes and detailed references as appendices only if allowed within the page limit.

p.5

lowother

No contact rule: 'Do not contact any City employee or official regarding this solicitation.' All communication must go through eProcurement Q&A portal. Violation could jeopardize the proposal.

Route all questions and communications strictly through the OpenGov eProcurement Portal Q&A function before the June 23, 2026 deadline. Brief all account/BD staff on the no-contact rule.

p.4

Overall risk assessment

This RFP presents a moderate-to-high overall risk profile driven primarily by three critical items: (1) a mandatory professional certification eligibility gate (CIA/CPA/CGAP/CFE/CGFM), (2) automatic disqualification for missing Form AA-1, and (3) a requirement to provide services without monetary limitations on liability. Additional risk stems from apparent template contamination with construction-oriented clauses (bid bonds, PROWAG, PCC 9204 public works claims procedure, C&D waste plan) that create ambiguity about actual applicability to a professional audit services engagement, as well as a conflicting pricing structure that simultaneously demands 'lump-sum' pricing and an annual 450-hour unit-priced line item. Proposers should submit clarifying questions before June 23, 2026, coordinate legal review of the unlimited liability and indemnification provisions, and ensure all pass/fail forms (AA-1, Non-Collusion, TPA, Conflict of Interest, DHS disclosure, Relevant Experience) are completed to avoid non-responsiveness.

Contacts

Abbey Tenn

Management Analyst IV

City Managers Office

Contact

p.4

For informational purposes only. Not a substitute for legal review.